Due:
March 8 (note change of date)
With this project, we will
move from text analysis to linking texts with history. The project has
several learning and evaluation goals:
-
It will get you started on interdisciplinary
practice by asking you to identify the connections between two disciplines
- textual studies and history.
-
It provides an opportunity for
you to deepen your understanding of history by thinking critically about
how historical trends shape the experiences and perspectives of individuals.
-
It provides an opportunity for
you to deepen your understanding of the texts you've been examining by
considering how they were influenced by larger historical patterns and
issues.
-
It will allow you to demonstrate
your understanding of the national-level history you've read about in Who
Built America?
Tasks:
-
Define the historical period
in which your 4 texts were created and/or used. This might be as narrow
as one year or as broad as several decades.
-
Make a list of the central historical
trends and issues of that period, especially those related to work and
class. If your list is long, select 3-5 items to focus on for the rest
of the project.
-
Create a grid with the historical
trends and issues on one axis and your 4 texts on the other, and in the
appropriate squares of the grid, make some brief notes about how each text
reflects or might have been influenced by each trend or issue.
-
Write a 3-4 page paper that explains
how your 4 texts reflect their historical context. Use specific examples
from history (use Who Built America? as your historical source) and from
the texts as evidence to support your analysis.
-
Turn in a folder with your list,
your grid, and your paper.
Grading
Criteria:
-
Is your project complete? Did
you complete all of the steps, thoughtfully and carefully?
-
Is your list of historical trends
and issues appropriate? Did you choose appropriate items to focus on?
-
Does your grid accurately and
thoughtfully indicate how the texts intersect with history?
-
Does your paper effectively explain
your analysis? Does it make good use of evidence from both history and
texts to support its key points?
Back
to Annotated Syllabus |