What is the issue we are trying to address? Weekly
seminars bring together students and faculty to learn about the latest
research being done in our field. Our physical chemistry faculty has
created a seminar course to improve student participation in the
seminar and in our faculty-student community.
|
|
How do we know that this is an issue? In
previous years, the physical chemistry seminar has had problems with
attendance, comprehension (tested by cumulative exams), and student
participation in the post-seminar discussion.
|
|
|
What is the change or innovation that is intended to address this issue? The
seminar now has a mandatory 2-credit course component for first-year
students in physical chemistry. Before the seminar, students read
papers (hand-picked by lead faculty) related to the speaker's research,
prepare questions for the speaker, and meet with the speaker and lead
faculty for a discussion of the speaker's research. Students are
expected to attend and take an active role in the seminar (e.g., invite
and host speakers).
|
|
Why did we select that approach? The
idea for a seminar course came up in the context of faculty discussions
on alternatives to formal coursework for our students. New students are
often unfamiliar with the vast array of technical methods used in our
field. A course that introduces students to the seminar topics, prior
to the actual seminar, with an emphasis on discussion, seemed like a
natural choice for improving student participation and the overall
educational experience of the seminar.
|
|
|
What is the intended effect of the innovation? The
seminar course is intended to improve student participation in and
comprehension of our divisional seminar and to give students more
opportunities to interact with department faculty and other leaders in
our field.
|
|
Seminar presenter meets with students during class time
|
|
|
Students actively discuss presenter's research
|
|
|
What data or evidence will demonstrate the effect of our innovation? Informal
interviews with both student and faculty participants suggest that the
seminar course, particularly its interactive format, is well liked.
Cumulative exams will continue to be used as a measure of student
comprehension.
|
|
|