Thicker arrows in the figures indicate greater amounts of critique and feedback. Esther provides
oral and written feedback to her individual students and the whole class on their draft articles (arrows 1 and 2). She conducts informal
individual conferences with students on their writing, marks individual papers heavily, and highlights class wide problems with anonymous examples.
When the student paper comes out both Esther and her beginning students spend time as a group critiquing the content, layout and writing (arrows 3 and 5). Students particularly relish using their new skills and knowledge to criticize the senior journalists. Occasionally
Esther will bring in newspapers from other high schools to perform the same exercise. Local papers fill the classroom daily and provide a third source for evaluating other journalists' writing, reporting and
design.
Finally, students are frequently asked to critique one another's papers (arrow 4).
Esther guides these critiques with handouts detailing the questions to ask of the piece (e.g. one handout asks "Is there a transition to background detail in the personality feature?"). Occasionally two
students will read the same student's article, so that the writer receives comments from more than one reader.
These relationships contrast with those in the advanced class,
where the teacher's role is less central and the student editors-in-chief lead the class.
Back to Writing Styles and Cycles...
|